<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 muscle cars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nextconceptcars.com/muscle-cars/top-10-muscle-cars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nextconceptcars.com/muscle-cars/top-10-muscle-cars/</link>
	<description>The blog that keeps your passion alive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 10:58:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: K-Daddy</title>
		<link>http://www.nextconceptcars.com/muscle-cars/top-10-muscle-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-55244</link>
		<dc:creator>K-Daddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextconceptcars.com/2008/02/16/top-10-muscle-cars/#comment-55244</guid>
		<description>&#039;69 Nova is where it&#039;s at. That beast would walk any of those cars in the quarter mile...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8217;69 Nova is where it&#8217;s at. That beast would walk any of those cars in the quarter mile&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.nextconceptcars.com/muscle-cars/top-10-muscle-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-53107</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextconceptcars.com/2008/02/16/top-10-muscle-cars/#comment-53107</guid>
		<description>Riviera, not a muscle car. It&#039;s a luxery.
Why is the Mustang first? It&#039;s one of the slowest on the list!

Okay, I was happy with the Buick, but really? A Riviera? No Skylark? No GS Stage 1? No GSX? The GSX walked on the Challengers and Chargers, walked on the Pony Mustangs, and had more horsepower than any car on this list!
And with an amazing quarter mile at 13 seconds it&#039;s also the fastest!

Also, yeah a lot of what I have said is mostly my opinion and love for the old Buicks, but it is also fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Riviera, not a muscle car. It&#8217;s a luxery.<br />
Why is the Mustang first? It&#8217;s one of the slowest on the list!</p>
<p>Okay, I was happy with the Buick, but really? A Riviera? No Skylark? No GS Stage 1? No GSX? The GSX walked on the Challengers and Chargers, walked on the Pony Mustangs, and had more horsepower than any car on this list!<br />
And with an amazing quarter mile at 13 seconds it&#8217;s also the fastest!</p>
<p>Also, yeah a lot of what I have said is mostly my opinion and love for the old Buicks, but it is also fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dulex11</title>
		<link>http://www.nextconceptcars.com/muscle-cars/top-10-muscle-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-47821</link>
		<dc:creator>dulex11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextconceptcars.com/2008/02/16/top-10-muscle-cars/#comment-47821</guid>
		<description>Dodge Charger &#039;69 ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dodge Charger &#8217;69 ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lionel</title>
		<link>http://www.nextconceptcars.com/muscle-cars/top-10-muscle-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-46779</link>
		<dc:creator>Lionel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextconceptcars.com/2008/02/16/top-10-muscle-cars/#comment-46779</guid>
		<description>Dodge Charger RT 1969 ?
Ford Mustang Shelby eleanor 1967 ?
Ford XB Falcon 1975 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dodge Charger RT 1969 ?<br />
Ford Mustang Shelby eleanor 1967 ?<br />
Ford XB Falcon 1975 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.nextconceptcars.com/muscle-cars/top-10-muscle-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-45536</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 20:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextconceptcars.com/2008/02/16/top-10-muscle-cars/#comment-45536</guid>
		<description>Can anyone say 1966 427 Cobra.....I knew you could.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone say 1966 427 Cobra&#8230;..I knew you could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.nextconceptcars.com/muscle-cars/top-10-muscle-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-22470</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextconceptcars.com/2008/02/16/top-10-muscle-cars/#comment-22470</guid>
		<description>Some great photos, but wow are you guys wrong....  In the little bit I read the comments or text are completely wrong...

Number 4, The beautiful 1970 Plymouth Cuda &quot;never&quot; had a V6.  You have to be kidding me!  also, there was no &quot;reborn&quot; Cuda or Baracude for 2009, and the car drove fantasicly...  I know.  I had one..., as we ll as Corvettes, Shelby Mustangs etc..

The Winner,Ford Mustand 350 GT 1965.
The car shown is a 1965 Ford Mustang and not a GT350, which would be a Shelby GT350.  However, it isn&#039;t one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some great photos, but wow are you guys wrong&#8230;.  In the little bit I read the comments or text are completely wrong&#8230;</p>
<p>Number 4, The beautiful 1970 Plymouth Cuda &#8220;never&#8221; had a V6.  You have to be kidding me!  also, there was no &#8220;reborn&#8221; Cuda or Baracude for 2009, and the car drove fantasicly&#8230;  I know.  I had one&#8230;, as we ll as Corvettes, Shelby Mustangs etc..</p>
<p>The Winner,Ford Mustand 350 GT 1965.<br />
The car shown is a 1965 Ford Mustang and not a GT350, which would be a Shelby GT350.  However, it isn&#8217;t one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

